Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41187156›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Machine learning models for risk prediction of age-related macular degeneration in Fujian eye study.

Yang Li, Bin Wang, Xiangdong Luo, Mingqin Zhang, Qinrui Hu, Xiaoxin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yang LiEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4638-3540
Bin WangEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Xiangdong LuoEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Mingqin ZhangEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Qinrui HuEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Xiaoxin LiEye Institute and Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAge-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a retinal disorder that significantly impairs vision. This study investigates various machine learning models for predicting AMD risk, laying the groundwork for further research using big data and determining the most effective predictive model.

methodsUtilizing data from 8211 records with 39 features from the Fujian Eye Study, a cross-sectional epidemiological investigation, several machine learning models were developed and assessed. The models included logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). Data preprocessing, feature selection, and model training were all key components of the study.

resultsAfter evaluating multiple models, the logistic regression model emerged as the most accurate, achieving a balanced accuracy of 0.6364. Among the predictive features, educational background had the highest influence on the model's predictions, with an average SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) value of 0.8199. Other significant factors included outdoor time and left eye spherical equivalent (OSSE), with SHAP values of 0.6474 and 0.6377, respectively.

conclusionThis study confirms that logistic regression is the most effective machine learning model for predicting AMD risk, with educational background identified as the most critical risk factor.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMacular DegenerationAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID41187156
PMCPMC12585047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.