Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41187119›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Challenges encountered by midwives performing basic neonatal resuscitation in health facilities in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Eric M Mafuta, Daniel K Ishoso, Carl L Bose, Benjamin H Chi, Patricia Gomez, Ingunn A Haug, Helge Myklebust, Antoinette K Tshefu, Jackie K Patterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eric M MafutaSchool of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7986-4618
Daniel K IshosoSchool of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Carl L BoseDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Benjamin H ChiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Patricia GomezJhpiego, Johns Hopkins University Affiliate, Baltimore, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Ingunn A HaugLaerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway.
Helge MyklebustLaerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway.
Antoinette K TshefuSchool of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Jackie K PattersonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3330-7872

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, an estimated five million children under the age of five die each year; 47% of these deaths occur during the neonatal period, and the vast majority in low- and middle-income countries. Events during labor are the cause of one quarter of neonatal deaths globally. Basic resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation reduces these deaths but is challenging to execute. To characterize barriers to implementation of basic neonatal resuscitation, we conducted a qualitative study using focus group discussions with midwives at three health facilities in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. We analyzed qualitative data using an inductive content approach in order to identify emergent themes and trends. Twenty-four midwives participated with a median age of 49 and over 80% with more than 10 years of clinical experience. We categorized challenges to implementing basic neonatal resuscitation into three themes with subthemes: 1) limited resources (subthemes: human resource limitations, inadequate and unprepared equipment, insufficient monitoring during labor); 2) inadequate simulated and clinical experience (subthemes: poor systems to support maintenance of skills, infrequent opportunity to resuscitate); 3) emotional burden of resuscitation (subthemes: decision-making under time pressure, tendency to stick to the routine, acute stress during resuscitation, moral distress after unsuccessful outcome). Our findings suggest that while simulation training is key, learning from clinical events may be a critical companion to address these barriers. We call for a new focus on developing and evaluating strategies that support providers in learning from every newborn resuscitation.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesMidwiferyResuscitationAdultDemocratic Republic of the CongoFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41187119
PMCPMC12585050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.