Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41187108›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2025

The central histaminergic system slows visual processing in the retina and lateral geniculate nucleus of awake mice.

Matteo Tripodi, Hiroki Asari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Absence of local retinotopy in the mouse optic tract.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matteo TripodiEpigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, EMBL Rome, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Monterotondo, Italy.
Hiroki AsariEpigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, EMBL Rome, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Monterotondo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3396-1935

Funding

EMBL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory processing is dynamically modulated by an animal's behavior and internal states. Growing evidence suggests that such modulation starts from early stages, already at the retina, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Combining pharmacological and chemogenetic tools with single-unit extracellular recordings in awake head-fixed mice, here we identified that the visual responses of retinal ganglion cells and the lateral geniculate nucleus were both made weaker and slower by histaminergic projections from the tuberomammillary nucleus of the posterior hypothalamus. The observed changes in the visual responses were, however, not directly linked with histaminergic modulation of pupil dynamics or locomotion behavior. Instead, our computational modeling analysis suggests that the temporal response modulations arise from changes in the intrinsic properties of the circuit, such as gain modulation via the histamine H1 receptors in the retina. Facilitation of visual processing at low histamine levels may offer an ethological advantage, enabling animals to respond rapidly to visual threats during periods of reduced activity.

Indexed as

Geniculate BodiesHistamineRetinaVisual PerceptionAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPhotic StimulationReceptors, Histamine H1Retinal Ganglion CellsVisual PathwaysWakefulnessHistamineReceptors, Histamine H1

Identifiers

PMID41187108
PMCPMC12585013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.