Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41187085›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

The lower boundary of workplace mistreatment: Do small slights matter?

Michal Hodor, Liat Eldor, Peter Cappelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michal HodorBusiness Economics, Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-4137
Liat EldorOrganizational Behavior, Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Peter CappelliManagement Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-9627-4027

Funding

Jeremy Coller Foundation (JCF) 0612016331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research in psychology, management, and more recently in economics, highlights the role of individual managers and their behavior in shaping employee performance. While emerging literature on harmful managerial behavior has focused primarily on severe forms of workplace mistreatment, especially various types of harassment, much less is known about its boundary conditions: How minor can a manager's bad behavior be and still negatively affect employee performance? We study what appears to be a very minor workplace mistreatment-failing to deliver an expected birthday gift and greeting card on time-and examine its effect on subsequent employee performance. Using a dynamic difference-in-differences approach with detailed data from a national retail chain, we find that this small slight leads to over a 50% increase in employee absenteeism and a reduction of more than two working hours per month. Our analysis suggests that emotional responses to perceived workplace mistreatment drive the results. These findings indicate that even modest slights can meaningfully harm employee performance.

Indexed as

Work PerformanceWorkplaceAbsenteeismAdultBullyingFemaleHumansMaleinterpersonal relationshipslabor supplymanager–employee interactionsworkplace mistreatment

Identifiers

PMID41187085
PMCPMC12626002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.