Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41187082›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Microfluidic networks using isotachophoresis.

Alexandre S Avaro, Shahab Mirjalili, Andrew D Griffiths, Juan G Santiago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandre S AvaroDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0003-1922-3629
Shahab MirjaliliDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0003-4293-2431
Andrew D GriffithsInstitut Chimie, Biologie, Innovation, UMR 8231, École Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles de la Ville de Paris, CNRS, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0808-3539
Juan G SantiagoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0001-8652-5411

Funding

Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (KTH)Swedish e-Science Research Centre (SeRC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of microfluidic technologies has enabled chemical and biological analysis systems with increased functionality, complexity, and parallelization. These functionalities often drive the creation and control of complex and dynamic fluidic architectures. Introduced here is a class of microfluidic network based on isotachophoresis (ITP), an electrokinetic process that can extract and purify samples, selectively transport, mix, and aliquot (split) samples in a system with no moving parts. Presented is a theoretical framework to describe these networks. The framework relies on the coupling between a one-dimensional description of ITP and two-dimensional, transient graphs to describe the dynamic evolution of ITP networks. We leverage this framework to create numerical simulations of branched ITP circuits. We build, control, and experimentally study a variety of ITP networks. These systems automatically split and merge ITP zones, enabling complex sample manipulation with minimal external control. The model captures the experimentally observed sample dynamics. We demonstrate an example system where an ITP network is used to control and quantify parallel CRISPR-Cas enzymatic reactions. The methods described here are generally applicable to highly complex topologies and may offer a basis for easily reconfigurable, electric field-driven microfluidic systems. Networks generally offer broad potential for automated chemical and biochemical analysis and lab-on-a-chip integration.

Indexed as

electrophoresisintegrated devicesisotachophoresismicrofluidicsnetworks

Identifiers

PMID41187082
PMCPMC12626016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.