SynthesisJMIR mental health2025
"It's Not Only Attention We Need": Systematic Review of Large Language Models in Mental Health Care.
Synthesis in JMIR mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Conversational Mental Health Chatbots: Protocol for a Systematic Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Opportunities and risks of large language models in digital interventions for substance use disorders.Current opinion in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Between Help and Harm: An Evaluation Study of Mental Health Crisis Handling by Large Language Models.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Model for Mental health Access and service use (CoMMA): A process model for technology-enhanced mental healthcare.Internet interventions · 2026Review
- Review
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Large Language Model-Based Conversational Agents in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Empowering mental health professionals in asynchronous online psychotherapy with GenAI.International journal of mental health systems · 2026Article
- Embodied simulation, body language, and symbolization: understanding somatic symptoms in psychoanalysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- How professional logics shape AI implementation in mental healthcare: a qualitative study of an LLM-enhanced chatbot.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- A critical narrative synthesis of psychological correlates, measurement, and reported findings on conversational AI engagement and dependence-related constructs.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental health care systems worldwide face critical challenges, including limited access, shortages of clinicians, and stigma-related barriers. In parallel, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools capable of supporting therapeutic processes through natural language understanding and generation. While previous research has explored their potential, a comprehensive review assessing how LLMs are integrated into mental health care, particularly beyond technical feasibility, is still lacking.
objectiveThis systematic literature review investigates and conceptualizes the application of LLMs in mental health care by examining their technical implementation, design characteristics, and situational use across different touchpoints along the patient journey. It introduces a 3-layer morphological framework to structure and analyze how LLMs are applied, with the goal of informing future research and design for more effective mental health interventions.
methodsA systematic literature review was conducted across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, JMIR, ACM, and AIS databases, yielding 807 studies. After multiple evaluation steps, 55 studies were included. These were categorized and analyzed based on the patient journey, design elements, and underlying model characteristics.
resultsMost studies assessed technical feasibility, whereas only a few examined the impact of LLMs on therapeutic outcomes. LLMs were used primarily for classification and text generation tasks, with limited evaluation of safety, hallucination risks, or reasoning capabilities. Design aspects, such as user roles, interaction modalities, and interface elements, were often underexplored, despite their significant influence on user experience. Furthermore, most applications focused on single-user contexts, overlooking opportunities for integrated care environments, such as artificial intelligence-blended therapy. The proposed 3-layer framework, which consists of the L1: LLM layer, L2: interface layer, and L3: situation layer, highlights critical design trade-offs and unmet needs in current research.
conclusionsLLMs hold promise for enhancing accessibility, personalization, and efficiency in mental health care. However, current implementations often overlook essential design and contextual factors that influence real-world adoption and outcomes. The review underscores that the self-attention mechanism, a key component of LLMs, alone is not sufficient. Future research must go beyond technical feasibility to explore integrated care models, user experience, and longitudinal treatment outcomes to responsibly embed LLMs into mental health care ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.