Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41186978›Full record

SynthesisJMIR mental health2025

"It's Not Only Attention We Need": Systematic Review of Large Language Models in Mental Health Care.

Andreas Bucher, Sarah Egger, Inna Vashkite, Wenyuan Wu, Gerhard Schwabe

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas BucherDepartment of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7315-3505
Sarah EggerDepartment of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0008-8392-7018
Inna VashkiteDepartment of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2047-6690
Wenyuan WuDepartment of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0000-8277-9668
Gerhard SchwabeDepartment of Informatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0453-9762

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health care systems worldwide face critical challenges, including limited access, shortages of clinicians, and stigma-related barriers. In parallel, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools capable of supporting therapeutic processes through natural language understanding and generation. While previous research has explored their potential, a comprehensive review assessing how LLMs are integrated into mental health care, particularly beyond technical feasibility, is still lacking.

objectiveThis systematic literature review investigates and conceptualizes the application of LLMs in mental health care by examining their technical implementation, design characteristics, and situational use across different touchpoints along the patient journey. It introduces a 3-layer morphological framework to structure and analyze how LLMs are applied, with the goal of informing future research and design for more effective mental health interventions.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, JMIR, ACM, and AIS databases, yielding 807 studies. After multiple evaluation steps, 55 studies were included. These were categorized and analyzed based on the patient journey, design elements, and underlying model characteristics.

resultsMost studies assessed technical feasibility, whereas only a few examined the impact of LLMs on therapeutic outcomes. LLMs were used primarily for classification and text generation tasks, with limited evaluation of safety, hallucination risks, or reasoning capabilities. Design aspects, such as user roles, interaction modalities, and interface elements, were often underexplored, despite their significant influence on user experience. Furthermore, most applications focused on single-user contexts, overlooking opportunities for integrated care environments, such as artificial intelligence-blended therapy. The proposed 3-layer framework, which consists of the L1: LLM layer, L2: interface layer, and L3: situation layer, highlights critical design trade-offs and unmet needs in current research.

conclusionsLLMs hold promise for enhancing accessibility, personalization, and efficiency in mental health care. However, current implementations often overlook essential design and contextual factors that influence real-world adoption and outcomes. The review underscores that the self-attention mechanism, a key component of LLMs, alone is not sufficient. Future research must go beyond technical feasibility to explore integrated care models, user experience, and longitudinal treatment outcomes to responsibly embed LLMs into mental health care ecosystems.

Indexed as

LanguageMental DisordersMental Health ServicesHumansLarge Language ModelsAIGenAIlarge language modelsLLMmental healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41186978
PMCPMC12627976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.