ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy often leads to breast and axilla-conserving surgery in stages II and III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients: A registry study.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Predictive Value of the Tumor-Stroma Ratio for Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy often leads to breast and axilla-conserving surgery in stages II and III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients: A registry study.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In stages II and III hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer, selecting patients for primary surgery (PS) or neoadjuvant therapy remains challenging. This study assessed the occurrence of minimally invasive surgery in the case of PS, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). This cohort study included women diagnosed with stages II and III, HR+ breast cancer in 2020-2022 in the Netherlands. Women with positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) cancer were excluded. Outcomes focused on surgical techniques and additional treatment. Of the 7809 patients, 4046 (51.8%) underwent PS, 956 (12.2%) received NET and 2807 (35.9%) NACT. NET patients were older (median: 71 years [33-94]), while NACT patients had larger tumors and more lymph node involvement (p < .001). Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was the first procedure in 2153 (53.2%) PS women, in 694 (72.6%) NET women and 1564 (55.7%) NACT cases. There was no difference regarding free surgical margins in NET versus NACT patients (p = .421). After adjusting for T-stage, BCS occurred significantly more frequently after NET (p < .001). Minimal invasive surgery on the axilla was common after NET (83.9%) and NACT (81.5%). In the PS group, 85% received adjuvant systemic therapy. Optimizing patient selection for neoadjuvant strategies could reduce surgical morbidity. NET was frequently associated with BCS, showed comparable surgical margin outcomes to NACT, and contributed to reduced axillary surgery. These findings suggest that NET is an effective strategy, compared to PS, to facilitate less invasive surgery on the breast and axilla, in HR+/HER2-, stages II and III breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.