Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41186945›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Advance Care Planning Motivators Among Adults With Serious Illness.

Sarah Nouri, Carine Davila, Stephanie H Chan, Brian Feltz, Anna Gosline, Rebecca L Sudore, Christine S Ritchie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah NouriDivision of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco.
Carine DavilaDivision of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Stephanie H ChanMassachusetts Coalition for Serious Illness Care, Boston.
Brian Feltz3D Research Partners LLC, Harvard, Massachusetts.
Anna GoslineMassachusetts Coalition for Serious Illness Care, Boston.
Rebecca L SudoreDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Christine S RitchieDivision of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Funding

Mentoring Researchers in Advance Care Planning for Underrepresented Older Adults at Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias and Their CaregiversK24AG054415 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI REBECCA L SUDORE · 2017 to 2026
$1.7M
CARES: A Caregiver-Facing Digital Symptom Assessment Tool for Marginalized Older Adults with Serious IllnessK76AG088348 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Sarah Nouri · 2024 to 2026
$728k
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG054415NIA NIH HHS K76 AG088348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Advance care planning (ACP) engagement is poorly understood among people with serious illness. Objective: Determine whether diagnosis of and worries about serious illness are associated with ACP engagement. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was based on a nationally representative survey administered April to May 2021 online or by telephone. Eligible participants were adults and English or Spanish language. Data were analyzed May 2023 to February 2025). Exposure: Having a serious illness. Main Outcomes and Measures: Three domains of ACP engagement: discussion with people close to participants, discussion with clinicians, and documentation in writing. Barriers to ACP documentation and worries about serious illness were also assessed. Survey responses were weighted to reflect the US Census population. χ2 tests and multivariable logistic regression models were adjusted for covariables to assess associations between serious illness and each ACP outcome. Results: Among 1854 participants (468 [weighted percentage, 25.2%] aged 65 years or older; 955 women [weighted percentage, 51.9%]; 193 Black [weighted percentage, 12.0%], 288 Hispanic [weighted percentage, 16.7%], 1218 White [weighted percentage, 61.2%]), 367 (weighted percentage, 20%) had serious illness. Overall, 1254 (weighted percentage, 65.9%) had engaged in ACP (283 of 367 [weighted percentage, 76.5%] serious illness vs 971 of 1487 [weighted percentage, 62.6%] without serious illness; P < .001); 1071 (weighted percentage, 55.3%) discussed ACP with people close to them, 462 (weighted percentage, 22.5%) discussed with clinicians, and 650 (weighted percentage, 32.8%) documented a surrogate. People with serious illness had higher odds than those without having discussed choices for surrogates and medical wishes with people close to them (aOR, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.19-2.07] and 1.66 [95% CI, 1.26-2.19]) and with clinicians (aOR, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.63-2.88] and 2.22 [95% CI, 1.67-2.94]). Serious illness status was not associated with ACP documentation. The most common barriers to documentation were not having thought about it (489 of 1171 [weighted percentage, 43.1%]) and assuming surrogates would know what they want (369 of 1171 [weighted percentage, 32.2%]). Participants who were worried (vs not worried) about being able to afford care, surrogates making the best or right decisions, having access to the best treatments, or having high stress or symptoms had significantly higher rates of ACP engagement. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of adults in the US, we found that ACP discussions with someone close to them were high, yet discussions with clinicians and documentation were low, even among people with serious illness. Our findings offer insights into how people's worries about serious illness care may affect their engagement in ACP, and how to leverage these insights to tailor patient-facing messaging about ACP.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningCritical IllnessMotivationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41186945
PMCPMC12587200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.