ArticleJournal of microscopy2026
Revisiting PSF models: Unifying framework and high-performance implementation.
Article in Journal of microscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wavefront estimation through structured detection in laser scanning microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Localisation microscopy often relies on detailed models of point-spread functions. For applications such as deconvolution or PSF engineering, accurate models for light propagation in imaging systems with a high numerical aperture are required. Different models have been proposed based on 2D Fourier transforms or 1D Bessel integrals. The most precise ones combine a vectorial description of the electric field and accurate aberration models. However, it may be unclear which model to choose as there is no comprehensive comparison between the Fourier and Bessel approaches yet. Moreover, many existing libraries are written in Java (e.g., our previous PSF generator software) or MATLAB, which hinders their integration into deep learning algorithms. In this work, we start from the original Richards-Wolf integral and revisit both approaches in a systematic way. We present a unifying framework in which we prove the equivalence between the Fourier and Bessel strategies and detail a variety of correction factors applicable to both of them. Then, we provide a high-performance implementation of our theoretical framework in the form of an open-source library that is built on top of PyTorch, a popular library for deep learning. It enables us to benchmark the accuracy and computational speed of different models and allows for an in-depth comparison of the existing models for the first time. We show that the Bessel strategy is optimal for axisymmetric beams, while the Fourier approach can be applied to more general scenarios. Our work enables the efficient computation of a point-spread function on CPU or GPU, which can then be included in simulation and optimisation pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.