ArticleMedical physics2025
Evaluation of unified harmonization of CT images across multiple tasks: A step towards AI generalizability.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn medical imaging, harmonization is pivotal for mitigating variability stemming from diverse imaging devices and protocols. Virtual imaging trials (VITs) can provide a way to simulate diverse imaging conditions in silico and thus provide a unique opportunity to assess the impact of such data variability on the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models and quantitative analyses, and further to harmonize across these sources of variability. This variability underscores the need for systematic harmonization. Systematic harmonization helps to ensure data consistency for AI and quantitative analyses, ultimately enabling more generalizable model performance. PURPOSE: To investigate the performance of a physics-informed harmonizer of lung CT exams across multiple imaging tasks, using a VIT platform.
methodsWe undertook a multi-objective evaluation comprised of four task-based scenarios: lung structure segmentation, emphysema quantification, emphysema differential across time, and lung nodule quantification. Three simulated datasets were generated by virtually scanning XCAT phantoms, comprised of 160 images for lung structure segmentation, 504 images for emphysema quantification and differential, and 1,044 images for lung nodule quantification. A physics-informed deep neural network served as the unified harmonization model for all tasks. For AI-based segmentation, the data were divided into 70/30 training/testing. Metrics of outcome were Dice coefficient and Hausdorff Distance at 95th percentile (HD95) for segmentation, mean difference and standard deviation from Bland-Altman plot for emphysema quantification, longitudinal harmonization metric (LHM) for longitudinal emphysema differential, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of radiomics features and the distribution for lung nodule quantification.
resultsThe harmonization algorithm produced better metrics (i.e. Dice score, HD95, mean difference, LHM, number of high ICCs) with specific marked improvements in image quantification. The analysis of pre- and post-harmonization led to improved Dice scores of 1.0% and 11.0% and reduced HD95 of 5.2% and 32.0% for lung parenchyma and pulmonary vessel segmentation, respectively. The harmonization decreased variability by 2.5% to 50.0% in biomarkers and radiomics features for emphysema quantification. It also lowered LHMs by 12.2% to 82.4% in emphysema differential and increased proportions of high ICC-based radiomics features (ICC ≥ 0.75) by 4.6% and 19.7% for lung nodule quantification across scanner and kernel variabilities, respectively.
conclusionsThe results indicated that the VIT methodology can play a significant role in harmonizing and aligning variabilities across multiple task-based scenarios, underscoring the feasibility of the synthetic dataset curation via VITs for model development. The study can also provide a benchmark in the development of effective harmonizers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.