Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41186920›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2025

Efficient Workflows for Quantifying Tumor Growth on H&E-Stained Digital Sections in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer.

Arisachi Tanaka, Liping Zeng, Zahra Malakoutikhah, Grace Y Lin, Mitchell Zhao, Eyal Raz, Samuel Bertin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arisachi TanakaDivision of Rheumatology, Autoimmunity, and Inflammation, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Liping ZengDivision of Rheumatology, Autoimmunity, and Inflammation, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Zahra MalakoutikhahDivision of Rheumatology, Autoimmunity, and Inflammation, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Grace Y LinDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Mitchell ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Eyal RazDivision of Rheumatology, Autoimmunity, and Inflammation, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Samuel BertinDivision of Rheumatology, Autoimmunity, and Inflammation, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2340-959X

Funding

Chronic Exposure to House Dust Mites: A New Risk Factor for Lung Cancer in Never SmokersU01CA276642 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Samuel P Bertin, Eyal Raz · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
BLRD VA IK6 BX005224NCI NIH HHS U01 CA276642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopic examination of tissue morphology using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining is a standard practice in histopathology for analyzing tissue specimens. In preclinical models of cancer, H&E-stained tissue sections are routinely used to assess tumor development and progression, including parameters such as tumor number, size, and histopathological features. Recent advances in whole-slide scanning and digital pathology now enable quantitative analysis of high-resolution digital images on a computer, replacing the need to examine physical tissue slides under a microscope. However, quantifying tumors on H&E-stained digital sections remains challenging, highlighting the need for accessible and reproducible methods that can be adapted to diverse tumor models. Here, we present two efficient workflows using QuPath, an open-source software for digital pathology and whole-slide image analysis, to quantify tumor multiplicity (i.e., the number of tumors) and tumor burden (e.g., tumor surface area) based on digitally captured H&E-stained tissue sections. As a proof of concept, we apply these workflows to two distinct lung cancer models: (1) an orthotopic model in which Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells are delivered intranasally or intravenously into syngeneic C57BL/6 mice, resulting in well-separated, easily distinguishable tumors amenable to manual quantification; and (2) a genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM) with lung-specific expression of oncogenic Kras

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsStaining and LabelingAnimalsCarcinoma, Lewis LungDisease Models, AnimalEosine Yellowish-(YS)HematoxylinMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSoftwareWorkflowEosine Yellowish-(YS)Hematoxylindigital image analysismouse lung cancer modelsquantitative pathologyQuPath softwaretumor burden quantification

Identifiers

PMID41186920
PMCPMC13192331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.