ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026
New risk model for prognostic prediction after surgical aortic valve replacement in hemodialysis patients.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S): Due to the poor prognosis of dialysis patients, accurately predicting life expectancy after aortic stenosis surgery remains challenging, leading to potential misselection of treatment options. This study aimed to develop a prognostic model specific to dialysis patients to facilitate individualized treatment selection.
methodsA total of 171 dialysis patients with aortic stenosis who underwent initial isolated surgical aortic valve replacement at seven cardiovascular centers in Japan between 2011 and 2021 were enrolled. The cohort was randomly divided into the training and validation cohorts in a 2:1 ratio. Risk factors contributing to mortality were identified from preoperative variables, and a prognostic model was developed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
resultsAmong the 171 patients, 88 deaths occurred during the total observation period of 488.9 person-years. The cumulative overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, were 74.7%, 59.4%, and 38.7%, respectively. An optimal risk model was developed, incorporating six factors: age, serum albumin, peripheral artery disease, sex, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and atrial fibrillation. The model demonstrated strong predictive accuracy, with a 5-year C-statistic of 0.723 (95% confidence interval: 0.658-0.788) and 0.656 (95% confidence interval: 0.543-0.770) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration plots confirmed that actual survival up to 5 years was well predicted (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.918, 95% confidence interval: 0.703-0.981).
conclusionsThe proposed model is a reliable prognostic tool for dialysis patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41186878What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.