ArticleCarbon balance and management2025
Analysis of farmers' willingness and concerns of participating in carbon sink loans: evidence from China.
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundForest carbon sink is a natural solution to reduce carbon emissions and balance the carbon cycle, and forest carbon sink loan is an important financial innovation to support cleaner production, but the project promotion faces many challenges. This paper investigates the Anji's bamboo carbon sink loan project in China and reveals the influencing factors of farmers' participation.
resultsFarmers are driven by interests and have a high degree of participation in the bamboo forest carbon sink loan program, but they do not know enough about the internal mechanism. Based on the neural network and FP-Growth algorithm association rule analysis, it was found that the willingness of farmers to participate in the project was mainly affected by age, education level, and source of income, and the concentration of the population was characterized by older age and lower education level. Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis, the respondents can be divided into risk-averse groups, active participation groups, experience-dependent groups, and cost-sensitive groups.
conclusionsDifferentiated measures should be implemented for different groups to promote the implementation of carbon sink projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.