ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Web-based explainable machine-learning tool for predicting five-year recurrence of colorectal cancer after curative resection: multicentre retrospective cohort study.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decision-centered artificial intelligence for perioperative care outside the operating room: a practical review for surgeons.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer multidisciplinary decision-making: concordance, predictive support and clinical translation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe World Health Organization identifies colorectal cancer as the third-most diagnosed malignancy and second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Up to 30% of patients relapse within 5 years postoperatively; however, conventional staging methods cannot reliably stratify individual risks, underscoring the need for precise, patient-centred decision-support tools.
methodsWe retrospectively analysed data on 1,789 colorectal cancer patients undergoing curative resection (2013-2023) from the Tri-Service General Hospital registry. Four tree-based machine learning algorithms were trained on demographic, tumour, immunohistochemical, and laboratory features. Patients were divided chronologically into training (January to September) and validation (October to December) sets. Feature importance was assessed using random forest impurity scores and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). A web-based artificial intelligence-clinical decision support system (AI-CDSS) was developed to provide real-time, scenario-specific five-year recurrence-risk estimates.
resultsOf the 1,789 patients, 406 (22.7%) experienced recurrence. The top 10 predictors accounted for approximately 43% of the total model importance. SHAP analysis confirmed that tumour burden, biological markers, treatment intensity, and host factors were key drivers of recurrence risk. On the validation set, all models achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.83-0.84. The random forest-based system demonstrated 87% accuracy, 85% positive predictive value, 87% negative predictive value, and an F1 score of 0.64, and was consequently selected as the AI-CDSS engine.
conclusionThe proposed AI-CDSS delivers personalised five-year recurrence-risk estimates for patients with colorectal cancer within 1 s via an intuitive web interface, facilitating evidence-based, patient-centred treatment decisions grounded in local population data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.