ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2026
Mental Health Leadership Perspectives on the Value of a National Virtual Contingency Staffing Program in the Veterans Health Administration.
Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rural and Non-Rural U.S. Veterans Receiving Virtual Geriatric Mental Health Services in the Clinical Resource Hubs.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temporary mental health (MH) staffing gaps are common and may compound access challenges due to increasing demand for MH care combined with a shrinking MH workforce. In 2019, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented a system of 18 regionally based Clinical Resource Hubs (CRHs) staffed with remote providers delivering virtual MH care. While the program demonstrated promise during early implementation for effectively addressing some access challenges, its sustainment may depend partly on leaders' perceptions of its ability to meet and adapt to access-related priorities. Our aim was to explore and describe how VA regional MH leadership identified and weighed values of the CRH during early implementation, and how it might have functioned beyond filling temporary staffing gaps. We conducted semi-structured interviews with CRH MH leaders (n = 36) across all 18 VA administrative regions. We analyzed data using a rapid qualitative approach that included templated summaries and matrix analysis. Three key perceived values of the CRH were identified: (1) its potential to offer a more integrated care experience than community (VA-purchased) care in some cases, (2) its ability to provide specialized MH services (e.g., suicide prevention) to rural areas and, (3) its capacity to improve MH provider recruitment and satisfaction. Virtual care delivered through the CRH can be a flexible option for maintaining access to MH services during staffing shortages. MH leaders' perspectives suggest the CRH program is not only a contingency staffing solution to access problems, but provides additional values that could be leveraged to improve MH care services more generally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41186817What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.