ReviewVeterinary research communications2025
Global expansion of lumpy skin disease: transmission trends, economic consequences, and preventive measures.
Review in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classification of Foot-and-Mouth and Lumpy Skin Disease in Cattle Using Frozen Pretrained Encoders: A Comparison of Convolutional and Transformer Architectures.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Windborne Dispersal of Arthropod Vectors as a Pathway for Lumpy Skin Disease Virus Introduction into South Korea: A Multi-Species, Source-Attributed Modelling Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Diagnostic approach, vaccination and treatment priorities for Lumpy Skin Disease in cattle: lessons from Balkan epidemics to Western Europe re-emergence (2025).Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD) is an emerging transboundary poxviral infection affecting cattle and buffaloes, caused by the Lumpy Skin Disease Virus (LSDV), a member of the Capripoxvirus genus. Characterized by fever, nodular dermatitis, lymphadenopathy, and production loss, the disease has evolved from a regionally confined threat in Africa to a global epizootic. While mortality remains below 5%, morbidity can reach 100% in affected herds, leading to severe economic disruption in livestock-dependent economies. Between 2005 and 2020, over 41,000 outbreaks were reported globally, nearly 30,000 in Africa, 8,800 in Asia, and 2,400 in Europe. The 2022 outbreak in India alone affected 2.4 million cattle and led to over 110,000 deaths, with estimated losses exceeding approximately $60 million USD. This review consolidates the current understanding of LSD's molecular virology, transmission dynamics, and global distribution. Mechanisms of transmission through direct contact, iatrogenic practices, and vector-mediated spread via mechanical and biological arthropods are reviewed in detail. Special emphasis is placed on mechanical transmission via Aedes aegypti, Stomoxys calcitrans, and Rhipicephalus appendiculatus, as well as the emergence of recombinant LSDV strains resulting from interactions between vaccine and wild strains. Molecular diagnostics (PCR, LAMP, NGS) and existing control measures, including live-attenuated and homologous vaccines, are critically evaluated. The review highlights gaps in vector surveillance, cold-chain infrastructure, and diagnostic reach, especially in developing nations. It underscores the urgent need for region-specific vaccine strategies and integrated vector control. Addressing this neglected livestock disease is crucial not only for animal health but also for rural livelihoods, food security, and economic resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41186797What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.