Observational studyActa neurochirurgica2025
Continuous intracisternal nimodipine administration as rescue therapy for refractory vasospasm in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.
Observational study in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDelayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI) and cerebral vasospasm (CVS) remain major causes of poor outcome in survivors of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH). We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of intracisternal administration of nimodipine in patients suffering from symptomatic CVS refractory to treatment with induced hypertension and endovascular vasodilator therapy.
methodsWe performed a single-centre, retrospective, observational study including all patients diagnosed with refractory CVS after aSAH treated at our tertiary centre between January 2018 and December 2021 who received continuous intracisternal nimodipine. For nimodipine administration, a catheter was inserted in the optico-carotid cistern via supraorbital craniotomy. Our primary outcome was functional independence measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included treatment related complications and neurological outcome.
resultsWe included 15 patients in total. Clinical outcome measured by the mRS at 6 months was good with 93.3% of patients showing mRS ≤ 1 (median mRS 1; range 1-4) Eight patients (53%) developed a new CVS-related neurological deficit during intrathecal nimodipine treatment and additionally received bolus intra-arterial nimodipine. Two patients (13%) developed acute subdural/epidural hematoma postoperatively, which was treated surgically in one patient. In two patients (13%), accidental dislocation of the intrathecal catheter occurred, which warranted re-operation.
conclusionContinuous intracisternal administration of nimodipine may be a viable rescue therapy option for patients with refractory CVS but is associated with an increased risk of treatment related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.