Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41186767›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025

Extramedullary tibial guide orientation in TKA personalized alignment: validation of a trigonometric method.

Rosario Junior Sagliocco, Filippo Leggieri, Andrea Baldini, Domenico Andrea Campanacci, Roberto Civinini, Matteo Innocenti

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rosario Junior SaglioccoScuola di Specializzazione in Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Filippo LeggieriScuola di Specializzazione in Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy. filippoleggieri@unifi.it.
Andrea BaldiniIstituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), Florence, Italy.
Domenico Andrea CampanacciScuola di Specializzazione in Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Roberto CivininiScuola di Specializzazione in Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Matteo InnocentiScuola di Specializzazione in Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAchieving personalized alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with conventional instrumentation remains challenging. This study validates a novel trigonometric formula that calculates the exact lateralization needed for the tibial extramedullary guide based on preoperative weight-bearing X-rays.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed 196 patients who underwent TKA between November 2018 and June 2023. Inclusion criteria: patients with preoperative weight-bearing AP lower limb X-rays aged 18 or older. Exclusion criteria: previous total hip arthroplasty, those without consent. The formula LAT = LENG(S) × sin α angle calculated tibial guide lateralization, where LAT was the lateralization distance, LENG(S) was the tibial length from radiographs, and α angle was the tibial coronal correction angle. The true radiographic lateralization was measured to validate the formula’s accuracy and defined a “safety zone” representing acceptable surgical margins to validate the formula’s accuracy and defined a “safety zone” representing acceptable surgical margins. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to test for the measurement consistency among observers. 95% Clopper-Pearson Confidence Interval was calculated for the frequency of lateralization falling within a “safety zone”. A T-test compared LAT measurements with true radiographic lateralization.

resultsICC showed that 97.2% of lateralization measurements fell within the defined “safety cone” (95% CI 93.9–98.9%). Inter-observer reliability was high (ICC 0.91). No differences were found between the formula-derived measurements and the true radiographic lateralization. The 95% Clopper-Pearson Confidence Interval was 93.9–98.9%. LAT was found to fall outside the safety cone with a total mean of 2.3° (range 1–5) in 2.8% of the cases, with a mean error in the degree of proximal tibial cut of -0.67° (range − 1 - +1). No association between CPAK and cases within or outside the safety cone was found (χ²= 5.014, p = 0.658).

conclusionsThis validated trigonometric formula enables surgeons to accurately calculate tibial guide lateralization for personalized alignment using only conventional instrumentation and standard radiographs. The method’s 97.2% accuracy within safe surgical margins supports its use as a reliable preoperative planning tool for personalized TKA alignment without requiring specialized software or robotic assistance.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeTibiaAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyRetrospective StudiesWeight-BearingExtrameduallry guideKinematic alignmentPersonalized alignmentTibia resectionTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41186767
PMCPMC12586221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.