ArticleExperimental brain research2025
The impact of electrical vestibular stimulation on the onset of erector spinae muscles activation elicited by a postural and a voluntary task.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The vestibulospinal and reticulospinal tracts play a crucial role in controlling lumbar erector spinae (LES). Electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) can be used to investigate the contribution of the vestibular system in the control of a muscle during a motor task. A recent study observed a minimal contribution of the corticospinal projection to LES in a voluntary spine extension. We thus hypothesised a greater involvement of alternative pathways originating in the brainstem such as vestibulo- and reticulospinal tracts in the control of LES for this task. This study investigates the impact of EVS on the activation of LES during postural and voluntary tasks. Fifteen participants performed two motor tasks: a bilateral shoulder flexion (postural task) and a lumbar spine extension (voluntary task) during a simple precued reaction time (RT) paradigm. During the RT tasks, EVS was applied at three different timings (early, middle and late) within a pre-defined time window. Outcomes were (1) LES onset latencies elicited by the motor tasks and conditioned by EVS and (2) the central processing duration (CPD). EVS significantly reduced the onset latency of LES activation in both postural and voluntary tasks. The CPD was shorter for the postural compared to the voluntary task for the early and middle conditions. EVS shortens LES onset, suggesting a contribution of brainstem networks/tracts in both tasks. The shorter CPD for the postural task at early and middle timings compared to the voluntary task suggests an earlier contribution of the brainstem networks/tracts during the postural task. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms and validate this paradigm.im.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41186750What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.