SynthesisBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Treatment of individuals incarcerated for sexual offenses in the German prison system: approaches and empirical findings].
Synthesis in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual offenses cause significant individual and societal harm. Psychosocial and psychotherapeutic interventions are considered central components of relapse prevention. However, international evidence on the effectiveness of approaches for treating individuals incarcerated for sexual offenses is inconsistent and marked by methodological limitations. This review examines the current state of research in Germany. For this purpose, the literature was systematically reviewed. The aim is to summarize the evidence on the effectiveness of treatment approaches over the past 25 years and to assess it with particular attention to methodological aspects.Empirical studies indicate that treatment can have positive effects on general recidivism (i.e., reoffending after release). However, there is no clear evidence for a reduction in sexual reoffending. Treatment dropout was associated with higher recidivism rates. Studies examining changes in risk-relevant factors report some favorable developments, but the highly heterogeneous quality and methodology of these studies limit the strength of the conclusions that can be drawn.Overall, it is currently not possible to make a definitive judgment about the effectiveness of inpatient treatment programs for sexual offenders in Germany. There is a clear need for larger, methodologically robust studies with equivalent comparison groups and detailed documentation of treatment content in order to generate reliable evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.