Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41186692›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025

Enhancing genomic predictive ability of yield and yield-related traits in spring wheat by integrating major plant adaptation genes as a fixed effect.

Yaotian Gao, Guriqbal Singh Dhillon, Pabitra Joshi, Justin Wheeler, Amandeep Kaur, Jianli Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating reaction norm and fixed effect models for genomic selection of end-use quality in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yaotian GaoDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, Aberdeen, ID, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4754-0975
Guriqbal Singh DhillonDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, Aberdeen, ID, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6766-810X
Pabitra JoshiDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, Aberdeen, ID, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2521-4104
Justin WheelerDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, Aberdeen, ID, USA.
Amandeep KaurDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, Aberdeen, ID, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9140-3424
Jianli ChenDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, Aberdeen, ID, USA. jchen@uidaho.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5932-0816

Funding

Idaho Wheat Commission IDA01627National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2017-67007-25939National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2022-68013-36439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) has emerged as a promising approach in plant breeding, especially for complex traits like grain yield that are influenced by many small-effect quantitative trait loci (QTLs). Choosing the optimal prediction model is important for GS. Using 4 years of field data from a diverse panel of spring wheat lines, the present study assessed the ability of seven statistical models to predict grain yield (YLD), total spikelet number per spike (tSNS), thousand kernel weight (TKW), plant height (PHT), and heading date (HD). The Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS) model was used as a basis for comparing predictive ability improvement of the other six models when major plant adaptation genes controlling flowering time, photoperiod response, plant height, and vernalization were treated as fixed effects. Incorporating fixed effects into the model substantially improved genomic predictive abilities, increasing them by 13.6% for YLD, 19.8% for tSNS, 7.2% for TKW, 22.5% for HD, and 11.8% for PHT. Thus, wheat breeders could apply this approach to GS in cultivar development and improvement. This finding could also be applied for GS in other cereal crops. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration in spring wheat of integrating adaptive marker sets (FT/Ppd/Rht/Vrn) as fixed effects within an RKHS framework to improve genomic prediction across yield and four yield-related traits.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalGenes, PlantGenome, PlantTriticumGenomicsGenotypeModels, GeneticPhenotypePlant BreedingQuantitative Trait LociSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID41186692
PMCPMC12586419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.