ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025
Enhancing genomic predictive ability of yield and yield-related traits in spring wheat by integrating major plant adaptation genes as a fixed effect.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating reaction norm and fixed effect models for genomic selection of end-use quality in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Integrating multi-model GWAS prior information enhances genomic prediction of cold tolerance traits in Populus simonii.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Uncovering the genetic architecture of biomass yield and related traits in Southern US oat germplasm using genome-wide association study.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Genomic prediction using a cost-effective mid-density SNP platform in spring wheat.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) has emerged as a promising approach in plant breeding, especially for complex traits like grain yield that are influenced by many small-effect quantitative trait loci (QTLs). Choosing the optimal prediction model is important for GS. Using 4 years of field data from a diverse panel of spring wheat lines, the present study assessed the ability of seven statistical models to predict grain yield (YLD), total spikelet number per spike (tSNS), thousand kernel weight (TKW), plant height (PHT), and heading date (HD). The Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS) model was used as a basis for comparing predictive ability improvement of the other six models when major plant adaptation genes controlling flowering time, photoperiod response, plant height, and vernalization were treated as fixed effects. Incorporating fixed effects into the model substantially improved genomic predictive abilities, increasing them by 13.6% for YLD, 19.8% for tSNS, 7.2% for TKW, 22.5% for HD, and 11.8% for PHT. Thus, wheat breeders could apply this approach to GS in cultivar development and improvement. This finding could also be applied for GS in other cereal crops. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration in spring wheat of integrating adaptive marker sets (FT/Ppd/Rht/Vrn) as fixed effects within an RKHS framework to improve genomic prediction across yield and four yield-related traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.