ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2026
[Neurological prognosis after cardiac arrest and resuscitation].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest : Current recommendations along the chain of survival and patient management].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following initially successful resuscitation and the achievement of a spontaneous rhythm, patients are mostly comatose and are transferred to the intensive care unit. The brain is particularly vulnerable for injuries under global ischemia or hypoxia and therefore severe brain damage without damage to other organs is a frequent occurrence. This is referred to as hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) and preferentially affects neurons in the cerebral cortex, the basal ganglia and the cerebellum. The brain stem is less vulnerable. The unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), previously known as apallic syndrome or vegetative state, is a frequent form of HIE and can persist for years in a ventilation nursing home. In many patients multimodal neurological prognostication enables a reliable prediction on whether a relevant recovery of cerebral function is likely or impossible, even during the stay in the intensive care unit. These include the clinical neurological examination after a sufficiently long observational time of mostly at least 72h, cerebral imaging, i.e., cranial computed tomography (cCT), if necessary cranial magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), electrophysiological examinations (electroencephalography, EEG), median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and determination of blood biomarkers (neuron-specific enolase, NSE, neurofilament light chains, NFL). Findings that make a severe HIE very likely are a bilateral lack of pupillary light reflex 72h after resuscitation, bilateral absence of cortical median nerve SSEP, highly malignant EEG pattern, NSE levels > 90 ng/ml and a lack of gray-white differentiation of the cerebrum in cCT. A normal NSE or NFL level 48-96h after resuscitation, an early continuous EEG with responses to external stimuli, high amplitudes of the median nerve SSEP and a normal cMRI make a severe HIE improbable. If the short-term clinical course and the prognostic investigations do not provide a clear determination of the extent of the HIE, a time-limited trial of a neurological early rehabilitation can clarify the question whether regaining consciousness with relevant cognitive functions occurs or not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41186682What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.