Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41186644›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

Lymph Node Metastasis Frequency and Development of Predictive Model in T1b Gastric Cancer: A Single-Center Study.

He Fei, Hu Ren, Zelin Wen, Chongyuan Sun, Zefeng Li, Penghui Niu, Zheng Li, Chunguang Guo, Yingtai Chen, Dongbing Zhao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

He Fei *Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Hu Ren *Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Zelin Wen *Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Chongyuan SunDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Zefeng LiDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Penghui NiuDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Zheng LiDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Chunguang GuoDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yingtai ChenDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. yingtaichen@126.com.
Dongbing ZhaoDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. dbzhao@cicams.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-2694

Funding

the Special Research Fund for Central Universities, Peking Union Medical College 3332023024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal management of T1b gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial, largely due to the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). This study aimed to clarify the anatomical distribution of LNM and develop a predictive nomogram for patients with T1b GC. PATIENTS AND

methodsClinical and pathological data from 1041 patients with pathologically confirmed T1b GC who underwent D2 gastrectomy at a single high-volume center in China were retrospectively analyzed. The frequency and distribution of LNM, including skip metastases, were assessed. Predictive factors identified by logistic regression were incorporated into a nomogram, which was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration plots.

resultsThe overall incidence of LNM was 28.34%, with first- and second-tier rates of 25.4% and 10.3%, respectively. LNM occurred across almost all nodal stations without a consistent anatomical pattern. Lymph node skip metastasis was detected in 2.98% of patients, with no reliable predictors. Importantly, no LNM was observed in well-differentiated tumors ≤ 3 cm, and in moderately to well-differentiated tumors of this size, metastases were confined to first-tier nodes. Multivariable analysis identified female, younger age, larger tumor size, horizontal location, poor differentiation, signet ring cell component, and lymphovascular invasion as independent predictors. The nomogram incorporating these factors demonstrated good discrimination (AUC 0.83; 95% CI 0.80-0.86) and favorable calibration and clinical utility.

conclusionsLNM in T1b GC shows a heterogeneous distribution and cannot be predicted by anatomical site alone. Sentinel lymph node biopsy with limited resection may be feasible for carefully selected patients with ≤ 3 cm, moderately to well-differentiated tumors, while D2 gastrectomy remains standard for others. The proposed nomogram may facilitate individualized surgical decision-making but requires external validation.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaGastrectomyLymph NodesNomogramsStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingLymph node metastasisLymph node skip metastasisNomogramPrediction modelT1b gastric cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.