SynthesisPediatric surgery international2025
Piperacillin/tazobactam versus ceftriaxone/metronidazole for children with perforated appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMost children with acute appendicitis are treated with laparoscopic appendectomy followed by antibiotics if the appendix is found to be perforated. There is variation in the type of post-operative antibiotics used for these patients.
methodsWe conducted systematic searches of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane for comparative studies of children with perforated appendicitis treated with post-operative piperacillin/tazobactam versus ceftriaxone and metronidazole.
resultsWe identified four studies consisting of 25,730 children with perforated appendicitis treated with laparoscopic appendectomy followed by post-operative piperacillin/tazobactam (n = 9,950) or ceftriaxone and metronidazole (n = 15,780). One study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and three were multicenter observational studies. Meta-analysis suggested no differences between piperacillin/tazobactam and ceftriaxone and metronidazole in terms of deep/organ-space surgical site infection (risk ratio [RR] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-1.65), post-operative imaging (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.71-1.37), return to the emergency department (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.50-1.37), and readmission to hospital (RR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.45-1.62). Heterogeneity between studies was substantial (I
conclusionThis systematic review suggests that there is ongoing uncertainty regarding the optimal post-operative antibiotics for children with perforated appendicitis. CLINICAL
trial registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023421492 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41186640What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.