Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41186618›Full record

ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2025

Quo Vadis, Cultural Psychology? Time to Become Psychology. Again.

Aaro Toomela

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Actual Challenges and Future Horizons of Cultural Psychology.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aaro ToomelaSepamäe Academy RT, Sepamäe, Estonia. aaro.toomela@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8520-9676

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper it is argued that cultural psychology today requires a fundamental reorganization. Based on the theories formulated by Anokhin, Vygotsky, and Luria, a program for cultural psychology to become a true psychology is formulated. Several steps, all discussed in some details in this paper, are needed to come up with a coherent set of ideas how to proceed with cultural psychology. First, it is necessary to define the object of studies, culture, psyche, and cultural psyche. Next, there are different epistemologies applied in psychology today. The best justified structural-systemic epistemology must be selected to proceed. This allows, third, to create methodology, a science of methods, which does not exist in mainstream psychology today. Fourth, it must be understood that psyche is a very complex unitary phenomenon. Cultural psychological theories must be built on the basis of multiple approaches to the study of psyche, among them comparative psychology, developmental psychology, educational psychology, cognitive psychology, cultural psychology, anthropology and ethnography, clinical and neuropsychology, social psychology. Unitary theory must be created that allows to understand how results of studies from different approaches consistently complement one another. Theories that are not supported from multiple perspectives are incomplete or wrong. Fifth, the progress of any science is grounded with discovering questions necessary to answer. How to ask questions and how to discover what questions should be answered, is another important theme to be developed. Finally, cultural psychology may become a most practical science if the essence of cultural psyche is scientifically explained.

Indexed as

CulturePsychological TheoryPsychologyHumansCultural psychologyEpistemologyMethodologyUnifying theory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.