ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Treatment of proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures : Options for revision arthroplasty].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the increasing numbers of implantations by total hip arthroplasty and the simultaneous aging of the population, in many countries the prevalence of periprosthetic fractures (PPF) is increasing. Older people with corresponding comorbidities are particularly affected. The frequent cause is low-energy trauma in the sense of a stumbling fall. The surgical treatment in orthopedics and trauma surgery is challenging. It cannot be compared with an elective shaft exchange or a solitary osteosynthesis. The combination of a vulnerable patient group and complex surgical procedures results in operations that are associated with high complication and mortality rates. Therefore, patients must be preoperatively prepared in the best possible way and these must also be performed with the least possible stress for the patient. The aim of this review article is to describe the risk factors of these injuries based on the current literature. The aspects of preoperative preparation, the classification of the fractures and the options for surgical treatment of Vancouver B2 and Vancouver B3 fractures are presented. The selection of implants and the form of fixation of the revision prostheses are also included. It is decisive that the approach is protective with respect to muscle tissue and results in a stable postoperative implant as patients are often cognitively not in a position to carry out partial weight bearing. Furthermore, aspects of postoperative aftercare, possible complications and prevention are described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41186615What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.