Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41186614›Full record

ReviewCell biology and toxicology2025

Lipolysis gone rogue: the HSL connection in feeding cancer.

Keerthana Hemadri, Poorvi Subramanian, Sivaroopan Aravindan, Loganayaki Periyasamy, Natarajan Aravindan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell biology and toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Keerthana HemadriDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Collage of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-7203-279X
Poorvi SubramanianDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Collage of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9604-0397
Sivaroopan AravindanDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Collage of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma, United States.
Loganayaki PeriyasamyDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Collage of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4467-4317
Natarajan AravindanDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Collage of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma, United States. natarajan.aravindan@okstate.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9150-3911

Funding

Tissue Pathology Shared ResourceP30CA225520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI James F Papin · 2018 to 2026
$27.1M
TUMOR RESISTANCE MECHANISMS TO ANTI-VEGF THERAPY IN PROSTATE CANCER (Sukyung Woo)P20GM103639 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI HANNAFON, BETHANY · 2012 to 2022
$21.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA225520NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipolysis, a tightly regulated metabolic process, is hijacked by cancer cells to meet their energy and biosynthetic demands under stress. Central to this process is hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL), a key enzyme that orchestrates lipid mobilization by hydrolyzing diacylglycerols into free fatty acids (FFAs). This review explores the pivotal and multifaceted role of HSL in cancer metabolism, focusing on its dual function acting as both a tumor promoter and suppressor depending on the cancer type and microenvironment. Lipolysis, the breakdown of triglycerides into free fatty acids (FFAs), is essential for maintaining energy homeostasis, and is co-opted by tumor cells to fuel growth. Enzymes such as ATGL, HSL, and MGL synergistically regulate lipolysis, with HSL being the driver in this process. Dysregulation of HSL can either promote or inhibit cancer growth, depending on the tumor type. We examine how deregulated HSL activity contributes to tumor progression, metastasis, and therapy resistance through metabolic reprogramming, particularly in the context of cancer-associated adipocytes (CAAs) and fibroblasts (CAFs). CAAs and CAFs within the tumor microenvironment modulate lipid metabolism, influencing tumor progression. The review also discusses the interplay between HSL and oncogenic signaling pathways, its regulation by hormonal and transcriptional networks, and its impact on immune modulation and cachexia. Finally, we evaluate the therapeutic potential of targeting HSL, emphasizing the need for cancer-type-specific strategies to exploit its vulnerabilities without exacerbating metabolic imbalance. By decoding HSL's role in cancer energetics, this review provides a foundation for novel interventions aimed at disrupting tumor lipid metabolism. Although, therapeutic strategies targeting lipolytic enzymes, such as HSL holds promise, this review also iterates the requisite for context specific considerations for successful application.

Indexed as

LipolysisNeoplasmsSterol EsteraseAdipocytesAnimalsEnergy MetabolismHumansLipid MetabolismSignal TransductionTumor MicroenvironmentSterol EsteraseCancer metabolismEnzyme regulationHormone-sensitive lipaseLipid dropletsLipolysisTumor progression

Identifiers

PMID41186614
PMCPMC12586420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.