Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41186562›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026

Overcoming the data barrier: transfer learning for 90-day mortality prediction in general surgery - a retrospective multicenter development and comparison study.

Axel Winter, Bjarne Pfitzner, Robin P van de Water, Lara Faraj, Christoph Riepe, Wolf-Heinrich Hahn, Felix Krenzien, Christian Schineis, Thomas Malinka, Wenzel Schöning and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Axel WinterDepartment of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7435-4993
Bjarne PfitznerDigital Health - Connected Healthcare, Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Robin P van de WaterDigital Health - Connected Healthcare, Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Lara FarajCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christoph RiepeDepartment of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Wolf-Heinrich HahnDepartment of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Felix KrenzienDepartment of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Christian SchineisDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Thomas MalinkaDepartment of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Wenzel SchöningDepartment of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Christian DeneckeDepartment of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Bert ArnrichDigital Health - Connected Healthcare, Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Katharina BeyerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Johann PratschkeDepartment of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Igor M SauerDepartment of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Max M MaurerDepartment of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComprehensive preoperative risk stratification is essential for improving perioperative outcomes and guiding informed decisions in general surgery (GS). However, data scarcity remains a key challenge to developing robust, high-dimensional artificial intelligence (AI) models. To address this data barrier in surgical AI, transfer learning (TL) enables neural networks (NNs) to transfer and adapt knowledge from pretrained source models to new domains with critically limited data availability.

methodsThis multicenter study included patients undergoing advanced GS at three tertiary centers between 2015 and 2023. Multiple large-scale source models for 90-day mortality prediction were trained on 85 preoperative parameters. Subsequently, organ-specific fine-tuning was performed for esophageal, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal surgery individually. TL models were benchmarked against standard ML models and conventional risk scores using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and F1-score, including 95% confidence intervals. Feature analyses were performed for each NN to investigate and compare model interpretability.

results14 922 patients (mean [SD] age: 58.5 [16.1] years) were included. Conventional ML achieved AUROCs of 0.75 (0.72-0.79; esophageal surgery), 0.80 (0.79-0.82; liver surgery), 0.73 (0.71-0.76; pancreatic surgery), and 0.92 (0.92-0.92; colorectal surgery) with corresponding AUPRCs reaching 0.37 (0.33-0.43), 0.30 (0.29-0.31), 0.29 (0.24-0.34), and 0.57 (0.56-0.58), respectively. TL significantly improved AUPRCs by 38% in esophageal (0.54 [0.51-0.58], P < 0.001), 14% in liver (0.34 [0.32-0.36], P < 0.001), and 8% in pancreatic surgery (0.31 [0.28-0.37], P < 0.001). Patient age and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) consistently emerged as the highest-weight features across all TL models. All NNs outperformed the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status and CCI as conventional risk scores in predicting mortality.

conclusionsMachine learning outperforms conventional risk modeling in preoperative mortality prediction. TL can significantly enhance model performance in surgical domains with limited data availability, offering a promising approach to overcome persisting data constraints for AI in surgery.

Indexed as

General SurgeryNeural Networks, ComputerSurgical Procedures, OperativeAgedArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentartificial intelligencegeneral surgerymachine learningpreoperative risk predictiontransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41186562
PMCPMC12825687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.