ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Assessing potentially inappropriate medication use among older adults in Central and Eastern Europe.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and its associated risk factors in community-dwelling older adults from five Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey, which was part of the Horizon 2020 EuroAgeism ESR7 project, was conducted between February 2019 and March 2020 in Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, and Serbia. We enrolled older adults aged ≥65 years who visited community pharmacies to acquire medications. The prevalence of PIM use was determined by applying all 282 criteria from the EU(7)-PIM list. Risk and protective factors for PIM use were evaluated using multiple logistic regression. R software version 4.3.2 was used in statistical analysis.
resultsMost of the 2,155 participants were women (63.3%) and aged 65-74 years (64.8%). The overall PIM prevalence was 56.0% (95% confidence interval 53.8%-58.1%), ranging from 29.5% in Czechia to 70.0% in Croatia. The most commonly used PIMs were benzodiazepines (16.7% of all PIMs), followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (14.3%), and proton pump inhibitors taken for more than 8 weeks (14.1%). Multiple logistic regression revealed that residence, increasing comorbidity burden, and polypharmacy were significant risk factors associated with PIM use in older adults.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate a high prevalence of PIM use among older patients from CEE countries and considerable cross-country differences, underscoring the need to improve medication prescribing for older adults to improve healthcare quality and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.