ReviewAustralian dental journal2025
Dynamic and Robotic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery-A Possible Workflow for the Future?
Review in Australian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trueness of implant placement, safety and surgeon experience with dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery : a prospective multi-centre cohort study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Robot-Assisted Dentistry: What the Evidence Supports and Which Outcomes Are Still Missing.Cureus · 2026Review
- Accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery among novice operators using three different patient registration methods: an in-vitro study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital technologies are reshaping dental implantology, with dynamic navigation and robotic systems offering high implant placement accuracy within clinically acceptable error ranges, the latter often achieving slightly higher accuracy. These systems enhance surgical accuracy and minimise trauma; however, high costs, extended preparation time, steep learning curves and uncertain patient acceptance limit their widespread adoption. This review summarises current principles, applications, benefits and limitations of dynamic navigation and robotic computer-assisted implant surgery (d-CAIS and r-CAIS), highlighting the need for clinicians to refine system proficiency and adapt their roles for future implant treatment procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.