ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Redefining Parameter Estimation and Covariate Selection via Variational Autoencoders: One Run Is All You Need.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diffusion models for virtual populations and pharmacometric simulations.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026Article
- The evolution of nonlinear mixed effects modeling in pharmacometrics: toward AI-based variational autoencoders.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026Article
- The Empirical Bayes Variational Autoencoder-A Neural ODE Approach for Population Modeling in Pharmacology.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Global Trends in Integrating Machine Learning (ML) with Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD): A Bibliometric and Systematic Review (2015-2025).Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Innovative applications of artificial intelligence technology in pharmacometrics.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) frameworks, such as Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), have proven powerful in learning structured representations from complex, high-dimensional data. In pharmacometrics (PMX), nonlinear mixed effects (NLME) modeling is widely used to capture inter-individual variability and link covariates to characterize parameters with the goal of informing key decisions in drug research and development. This research combines the strengths of both approaches by introducing a VAE framework specifically designed for NLME modeling. The proposed method integrates the flexibility of generative AI with the interpretability and robustness of mechanism-based PMX modeling. To advance covariate selection in PMX, we replace the Evidence Lower Bound objective in VAEs with an objective function based on the corrected Bayesian information criterion. This enables the simultaneous evaluation of all potential covariate-parameter combinations, thereby allowing for automated and joint estimation of population parameters and covariate selection within a single run. Manual selection and repeated model fitting across covariate combinations are no longer required. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this combined AI-PMX approach with two representative cases. As the first generative AI-based optimization method for NLME modeling, the VAE achieves high-quality results in a single run, outperforming traditional stepwise procedures in terms of efficiency. As such, the presented approach facilitates automated model development, advancing PMX and its applications in model-informed drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.