ArticleNursing & health sciences2025
Machine Learning Techniques for Identifying Lifestyle Factors Associated With Low Back Pain in Adults Aged 50 and Older Using Data From the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Article in Nursing & health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum lipids and low back pain in male aircraft maintenance technicians: association after ergonomic exposure adjustment.Journal of occupational health · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Techniques for Identifying Lifestyle Factors Associated With Low Back Pain in Adults Aged 50 and Older Using Data From the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Nursing & health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is shaped by multiple lifestyle factors, yet models with practical behavioral cutoffs remain scarce. This study developed a machine learning model to identify key lifestyle factors and specific thresholds linked to cLBP in adults aged 50 and older, using data from 5607 participants in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Machine learning algorithms were trained and validated, with performance assessed via AUROC and SHAP for interpretability. The logistic regression model performed best (AUROC = 0.721, 95% CI: 0.699-0.742). SHAP analysis revealed that higher cLBP risk was associated with older age, female gender, prolonged sitting (≥ 6 h/day), low walking frequency (< 4-5 times/week), infrequent strength training (< 1 time/week), moderate-intensity work, elevated stress, and smoking over five packs lifetime. Diet also mattered: cLBP risk rose among those dining out less than ~2.2 times/week, consuming under 2.9 servings/day of protein, or with carbohydrate intake outside 55%-65% of total energy. These practical cutoffs can help clinicians identify high-risk individuals through simple assessments, guiding tailored interventions in physical activity, diet, smoking cessation, and stress management to prevent cLBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.