ArticleGlobal change biology2025
Response of Global Forest Management to Changes in Wood Demand.
Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Response of Global Forest Management to Changes in Wood Demand.Global change biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global wood harvests have steadily increased over the last several decades and are projected to continue growing to match demand for wood products. How forest managers respond to changes in wood demand depends not just on timber prices and production costs but also on competition with other land uses, changes in forest productivity, and land use policies. Wood demand projections are sensitive to assumptions about socioeconomic development, including population growth, economic growth, and policy changes. Using a spatially detailed, process-based land use model (LandSyMM), we simulate global wood demand, harvests, and forest management intensity under a range of future socioeconomic (Shared Socioeconomic Pathways; SSPs) and climate (Representative Concentration Pathways; RCPs) scenarios. Wood demand is projected for each country using a price-elastic demand system that models changes in demand for industrial roundwood and wood fuel in response to changes in countries' incomes and endogenously modelled wood prices. Competition for land between forestry and agriculture, including for food and animal feed, is explicitly represented. We find that future wood harvests and forest management intensity vary considerably between scenarios. Different regions show heterogeneous responses to changes in wood demand, with global demand increasing between 27% (SSP1-RCP2.6) and 102% (SSP3-RCP7.0) by 2100. The results suggest that additional wood harvests will primarily be met through intensification of forest management and an increase in potential yields arising from climate change and CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.