ArticleThe South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings2025
Identifying and describing school-age children who would benefit from AAC: A scoping review of survey tools.
Article in The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor decades, teaching and learning have relied primarily on oral communication. However, learners with little or no functional speech (LNFS) require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) strategies to support learning and interaction.
objectivesThis scoping review aims to map available survey instruments used to identify and describe learners who could benefit from AAC, and to highlight research gaps in this area.
methodThe scoping review methodology, guided by the Johanna Briggs Institute was followed. A comprehensive search was conducted across nine databases: Academic Search Complete, Health Source: Science/Academic Edition Nursing, ERIC, Africa Wide Information, Scopus, PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycInfo. The search terms were combined using BOOLEAN operators. Studies were included if they: (1) involved learners aged 5-21 years with LNFS, (2) addressed any educational context, (3) report on any screening instrument (4) were published after 1985, (5) were written in English and (6) presented primary data in a peer-reviewed journal.
resultsFollowing PRISMA-ScR guidelines, 890 articles were identified, 251 duplicates were removed. Of the remaining 639, 14 underwent full-text review, and seven met the inclusion criteria. No standardised survey instruments were found. Most clinicians adapted or created surveys to meet specific needs, although common variables were assessed, such as learner characteristics and AAC strategies.
conclusionThe absence of standardized tools to identify learners with LNFS reveals a significant research gap.Contribution: This review underscores the urgent need for standardised instruments to guide clinical ad educational practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.