Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41185915›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Non-Medical Activities in Dementia Care in Germany: Use and Experienced Effects.

Francisca S Rodriguez, Nadja Ziegert, Sabrina D Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francisca S RodriguezGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2919-5510
Nadja ZiegertGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Greifswald, Germany.
Sabrina D RossGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have shown benefits through non-pharmacological interventions for people with dementia. Non-medical activities (i.e., activities outside the medical sector) may have similar effect. As little is known about the use and perceived effects of non-medical activities in dementia care, this study's aim was to obtain population-based descriptive information. A survey in the form of structured interviews was conducted with n = 134 stakeholders. Participants used on average 17.7 non-medical activities (i.e., social, leisure, and household activities). They reported perceiving effects for, on average, 85.1% of the activities, which were mostly effects on improvements in wellbeing, activation, and social health. Overall, a higher use of non-medical activities was significantly associated with perceiving more effects, especially on cognition and preserving abilities, and perceiving not knowing an activity as a barrier. However, this differed by stakeholder group: Perceiving effects on cognition was only significant for caregiving professionals. Further, for this group, feeling sufficiently trained for dealing with dementia and self-organizing/ self-financing activities was associated with a higher use. Overall, the results indicate that non-medical activities are an important component of dementia care that seem to come with important benefits.

Indexed as

DementiaAgedCaregiversFemaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicLeisure ActivitiesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAlzheimer’sdementiadementia carehealth service utilizationinterventionnon-pharmacologicalpsychosocial

Identifiers

PMID41185915
PMCPMC12586855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.