Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41185910›Full record

ArticleCurationis2025

Barriers and facilitators to maintaining confidentiality for HIV and AIDS patients in OR Tambo, Eastern Cape.

Ntombesitatu Qotoyi, Agrinette N Madolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Curationis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ntombesitatu QotoyiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha. ntombesitatu.qotoyi@echealth.gov.za.
Agrinette N Madolo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare practitioners are required to keep patient information private, though sharing is sometimes necessary for patient care, risking confidentiality breaches that can compromise privacy rights. Professional nurses lead HIV prevention, treatment, and care services, but issues like loss to follow-up and confidentiality breaches leading patients to move between clinics to hide their status pose challenges.

objectivesThis study explored factors influencing professional nurses' ability to maintain confidentiality in primary healthcare facilities in OR Tambo, Eastern Cape, aiming to develop intervention strategies.

methodA qualitative, descriptive, contextual design was used. Nineteen purposively sampled professional nurses participated in semi-structured interviews until data saturation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed using Tesch's method.

resultsFindings revealed that confidentiality is impacted by resource shortages, limited knowledge, negative attitudes, and inadequate training. Challenges vary across facilities, but nurses recognize the importance of confidentiality. Participants suggested the need for ongoing training on guidelines and consent procedures to uphold confidentiality.

conclusionStrengthening confidentiality in HIV care requires comprehensive strategies, including staff empowerment, infrastructure improvements, and initiatives to positively influence staff attitudes.Contribution: These insights can guide the development of targeted interventions, inform curriculum enhancements, and support future research initiatives.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelConfidentialityHIV InfectionsNursesAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSouth AfricabarriersboundariesconfidentialityEastern CapefacilitatorsHIV and AIDSprimary healthcare

Identifiers

PMID41185910
PMCPMC12587145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.