ReviewCureus2025
Artificial Intelligence in U.S. Surgical Training: A Scoping Review Mapping Current Applications and Identifying Gaps for Future Research Applications.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of an AI workshop on knowledge and attitudes toward AI in scientific publishing among surgeons at an international abdominal wall surgery congress.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly applied in general surgery education, yet their full impact on training across different learner levels remains unclear. The objectives of this study are to map the current use of AI/ML in general surgery education, with a focus on skill acquisition, risk stratification, and competency evaluation. The eligibility criteria included studies involving AI/ML interventions in general surgery training for medical students, residents, or practicing surgeons. Articles focused solely on clinical outcomes or non-surgical fields were excluded. A systematic search of databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and IEEE Xplore, was conducted. Data were extracted on study design, training level, type of AI/ML tool, educational focus, and key outcomes. A total of 18 studies were selected, which focused on simulation-based training, skill assessment, and decision support. Common barriers included a lack of standardization and limited integration into curricula. AI/ML shows promise in enhancing surgical education, but further research is needed to validate tools, measure impact, and address integration challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.