ArticleCureus2025
Utility of Virtual New-Patient Breast Surgery Clinics in Women Under 30 Years Old.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVirtual consultations (VCs) have been utilized across various clinical specialties and have the potential to reduce outpatient clinic costs and improve patient satisfaction. In breast surgery, we aimed to assess the utility and feasibility of VC in new-patient clinics for women under 30, who are considered a low-risk subgroup.
methodsBetween December 2020 and April 2021, data were consecutively collected from 118 women aged under 30 who were referred from primary care to the breast clinic. Participants were offered VCs, followed by ultrasound (USS) if clinically indicated and/or face-to-face review. Clinicopathological data were collected on referrals, imaging, and follow-up, with descriptive statistics used for analysis.
resultsAn outpatient USS was performed by a sonographer trained in palpation for 80.3% (n = 94) of patients after a review in the VC clinic. In comparison, 15.4% (n = 18) of patients were reassured and discharged directly after the VC consultation. The USS was normal in 64.9% (n = 61) of patients, with the remainder showing benign pathology. Six biopsies were performed, all of which were benign. Only 14.4% (n = 17) of patients required a face-to-face appointment with a breast surgeon, and 64.1% (n = 75) of patients were discharged after VC + USS alone. Routine follow-up of benign disease was organized for 6.0% (n = 7) of patients, with one patient booked for elective surgery for benign disease. No adverse events were reported.
conclusionUtilizing VC, the majority of new referrals did not require face-to-face appointments, and the diagnosis rate is low in this younger age subgroup. VCs have the potential to reduce the burden on new-patient clinics and reduce costs while improving patient convenience. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to assess the long-term safety of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.