ArticleCureus2025
Adiponectin Paradox in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Pericardial Fluid and Plasma Levels.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Adiponectin is an anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective adipokine involved in the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Although it has been extensively studied in blood, data on its concentrations in pericardial fluid remain scarce. Objectives This study aimed to assess adiponectin levels in plasma and pericardial fluid of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to evaluate their clinical significance in comparison with healthy individuals. Methodology Pericardial fluid and plasma samples were obtained from 50 patients who underwent CABG, while plasma samples were collected from 50 healthy controls. Adiponectin levels were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Results In the patient group, the plasma adiponectin level was 7.68±1.76 ng/mL (median: 7.70), while the pericardial fluid level was 8.70±3.16 ng/mL (median: 8.56). The plasma level in the healthy control group was 5.25±0.77 ng/mL (median: 5.20), significantly lower than that in the patient group (p<0.001). No significant difference was observed between patient plasma and pericardial fluid levels (p=0.070). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed a high discriminative power of plasma adiponectin levels in distinguishing patients from controls, with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.901. Conclusion Elevated adiponectin levels in both plasma and pericardial fluid of CABG patients suggest regulation by systemic and local mechanisms, possibly via epicardial adipose tissue. This pattern aligns with the "adiponectin paradox," where increased levels may reflect a compensatory response or cardiac stress in advanced disease. Pericardial fluid assessment provides novel insights into the cardiac microenvironment with potential diagnostic and prognostic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.