Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41185776›Full record

ArticleAffective science2025

Executive Functions and Emotional Granularity: No Evidence for Positive Associations.

Marcel C Schmitt, Julia Karbach, Tanja Könen, Ulrike Basten, Julia A Glombiewski, Tina In-Albon, Tanja Lischetzke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Affective science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcel C SchmittRPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, Fortstr. 7, 76829 Landau, Germany.
Julia KarbachRPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, Fortstr. 7, 76829 Landau, Germany.
Tanja KönenRPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, Fortstr. 7, 76829 Landau, Germany.
Ulrike BastenRPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, Fortstr. 7, 76829 Landau, Germany.
Julia A GlombiewskiRPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, Fortstr. 7, 76829 Landau, Germany.
Tina In-AlbonRPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, Fortstr. 7, 76829 Landau, Germany.
Tanja LischetzkeRPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, Fortstr. 7, 76829 Landau, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotional granularity is the ability to experience one's emotional experiences in a nuanced and specific manner. According to the theory of constructed emotion, between-person differences in emotional granularity are a function of how efficiently individuals categorize affect-related input by means of emotion concepts. We propose that executive functions support the effective coordination of the emotion categorization process, thereby facilitating emotional granularity. In the present study, we empirically examined the associations between three domains of executive functions (i.e., working memory, inhibition, and shifting) and emotional granularity for both negative and positive emotions (negative and positive emotional granularity) in two samples (participants with and without chronic pain). We hypothesized that all three executive function domains would be positively associated with both negative and positive emotional granularity. Participants ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-025-00307-y.

Indexed as

Chronic PainEmotional GranularityEmotion CategorizationEmotion DifferentiationExecutive Functions

Identifiers

PMID41185776
PMCPMC12579614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.