Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41185773›Full record

ReviewAffective science2025

The Role of Cognitive Effort in Emotion Regulation.

Christoph Scheffel, Anne Gärtner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Affective science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christoph ScheffelDifferential and Personality Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5963-9229
Anne GärtnerDifferential and Personality Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4296-963X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion regulation (ER) is a dynamic, multi-stage process encompassing the identification, selection, implementation, and monitoring of ER strategies. Empirical studies on ER have increasingly focused on understanding the role of cognitive effort throughout ER processes. Cognitive effort is an essential component of various ER stages: from identifying the need to regulate emotions, through the selection and implementation of ER strategies, to the monitoring of regulatory behavior. The review highlights substantial inter-individual variability in effort expenditure across ER stages and explores the impact of cognitive costs on regulatory outcomes. To synthesize the reviewed evidence, we propose an integrative framework that outlines the potential impact of cognitive effort across the different stages of emotion regulation. Findings suggest that high effort demands can increase the likelihood of regulatory failure, perpetuating negative emotional states and impairing well-being. Conversely, automatic ER processes, while less effortful, may limit adaptability to novel emotional challenges. Understanding the interplay between cognitive effort and ER is crucial for elucidating key components of the regulatory process and their implications for individual well-being.

Indexed as

Automatic regulationCognitive effortEmotionEmotion regulationRegulatory flexibility

Identifiers

PMID41185773
PMCPMC12579607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.