Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41185771›Full record

ArticleAffective science2025

Cognitive Reappraisal is More Effective for Regulating Emotions than Moods.

Samuel Meyers, Danfei Hu, Maya Tamir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Affective science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel MeyersThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, 9190501 Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7825-6426
Danfei HuThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, 9190501 Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6228-692X
Maya TamirThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, 9190501 Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-2675-8042

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive reappraisal is one of the most commonly used and effective emotion regulation strategies. This is partly because reappraisal targets a key characteristic of emotion - namely, what an emotion is about (i.e., intentionality). It is commonly assumed that whereas emotions have intentionality because they are about something, mood states do not have intentionality because they are typically not about anything in particular. Given that reappraisal targets intentionality, and mood states theoretically lack intentionality, we hypothesized that reappraisal would be less effective in regulating moods than in regulating emotions. We tested this hypothesis in two studies, one in which we assessed naturally occurring experiences and regulation in daily life (Study 1, Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-025-00310-3.

Indexed as

Cognitive reappraisalEmotion regulationIntentionalityMood regulation

Identifiers

PMID41185771
PMCPMC12579643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.