ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Comparative Immunogenicity and Safety of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine When Administered Using Needle Free Injection System to That with Conventional Needle-Syringe in India: A Randomized, Parallel Group Study.
Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pain due to injection and fear of needles is documented barriers to vaccination in children. Needle-Free Injection System ie N-FIS Methodology: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel group study (January-September 2024). Eligible participants 9-12 months of age were administered MMR vaccine 0.5 mL, subcutaneously using either N-FIS Results: A total of 60 infants with mean age of 10.5 months were enrolled in the study. At 28 day post dose 1 there was a significant and comparable rise in the MMR GMTs between the two groups. Similarly, at 28 day post vaccination, there was a significant rise in the proportions of seropositive subjects and the rates were comparable between the two groups (Measles: 100% vs 83%, p = 0.046; Mumps: 96.1% vs 95.8%, p = 0.999, Rubella: 92.3% vs 100%, p = 0.491). N-FIS was well tolerated and significantly lower number of subjects experienced pain (12% with N-FIS vs 33% with syringe). No serious or severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Administration of MMR vaccine using N-FIS induced robust and comparable immune responses to that observed with use of Needle-syringe and was well tolerated providing an alternative to paediatrician over conventional delivery system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.