Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41185764›Full record

ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Comparative Immunogenicity and Safety of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine When Administered Using Needle Free Injection System to That with Conventional Needle-Syringe in India: A Randomized, Parallel Group Study.

B S Ratta, Ankur Naik, Sarvesh Mutha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

B S Ratta *Consultant Paediatric Surgeon, Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, India.
Ankur Naik *Chief Technology Officer, IntegriMedical Private Limited, Pune, India.ORCID 0009-0007-2247-0678
Sarvesh Mutha *Chief Business Officer, IntegriMedical Private Limited, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pain due to injection and fear of needles is documented barriers to vaccination in children. Needle-Free Injection System ie N-FIS Methodology: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel group study (January-September 2024). Eligible participants 9-12 months of age were administered MMR vaccine 0.5 mL, subcutaneously using either N-FIS Results: A total of 60 infants with mean age of 10.5 months were enrolled in the study. At 28 day post dose 1 there was a significant and comparable rise in the MMR GMTs between the two groups. Similarly, at 28 day post vaccination, there was a significant rise in the proportions of seropositive subjects and the rates were comparable between the two groups (Measles: 100% vs 83%, p = 0.046; Mumps: 96.1% vs 95.8%, p = 0.999, Rubella: 92.3% vs 100%, p = 0.491). N-FIS was well tolerated and significantly lower number of subjects experienced pain (12% with N-FIS vs 33% with syringe). No serious or severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Administration of MMR vaccine using N-FIS induced robust and comparable immune responses to that observed with use of Needle-syringe and was well tolerated providing an alternative to paediatrician over conventional delivery system.

Indexed as

immunogenicitymeaslesmumpsneedle free injection systemrubella

Identifiers

PMID41185764
PMCPMC12579826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.