ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Strabismus Surgery in Orthophoric Patients with Abduction Limitation.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with symptomatic esotropia in lateral gaze after lateral rectus recession may not be offered surgery if they are orthophoric in primary gaze due to concern of creating diplopia in primary gaze. There are currently no reports of the surgical management of these cases. The purpose of this study was to report our experience and describe the surgical outcomes for these rare patients. Methods: A comprehensive, retrospective review of all patients undergoing strabismus surgery at Boston Children's Hospital over an 11-year period identified all cases of orthophoric patients operated on for diplopia in lateral gaze following lateral rectus recession(s). Surgical approach, pre- and post-operative measurements in diagnostic gaze positions, and surgical outcomes were assessed. We developed a new lateral incomitance (LI) score to characterize patient disability before and after surgery. Main outcome measures were improvement in LI score and lateral gaze diplopia, lack of new-onset diplopia in primary gaze, and patient/surgeon satisfaction. Results: In all cases, previously recessed lateral rectus muscles were advanced 2-3 mm with an adjustable suture technique despite anticipated exotropia in primary gaze. Early, large-angle, transient sequential exotropia with diplopia was common. All patients had resolution of lateral-gaze diplopia with improvement in LI score by 8-18 PD, and none experienced persistent new-onset diplopia in primary gaze (median follow-up 16 months; range, 8.5-83 months). One patient with a history of surgery for convergence insufficiency developed a well-controlled intermittent exotropia; no other patient had exotropia in primary gaze. Conclusion: Small, adjustable advancements of the lateral rectus muscles provided excellent results in our series of patients with lateral gaze esotropia caused by previous lateral rectus recessions. Despite large, early overcorrections, LI scores improved in all cases, and no patient had recurrence of symptomatic exotropia. The results will support surgical decision-making in the management of these challenging cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.