ArticleIJU case reports2025
A Case of Synchronous Bilateral Spermatocytic Tumor.
Article in IJU case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spermatocytic tumor is rare, accounting for approximately 1% of all testicular neoplasms. It is clinically and pathologically distinct from classical seminoma and typically presents as a unilateral, slow-growing mass in older men. Case Presentation: A 54-year-old man presented with painless bilateral scrotal swelling. Imaging revealed heterogeneous masses in both testes, and laboratory findings were within normal limits. Left high orchiectomy revealed polygonal cells with clear cytoplasm, initially suggesting seminoma. Given the patient's age and histological features, immunohistochemistry was performed. A right high orchiectomy was subsequently conducted. Both tumors were diagnosed as spermatocytic tumors based on SALL4 positivity and PLAP, c-kit, and Vimentin negativity. The patient developed postoperative hypogonadism and began testosterone replacement therapy. No recurrence was observed during 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: This rare case of synchronous bilateral spermatocytic tumor highlights the importance of considering this diagnosis in older men with bilateral testicular masses. Immunohistochemistry is essential for accurate identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.