ReviewCureus2025
A New Era for Esketamine in Managing Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Systematic Review of Its Use From Adjunct to First-Line Therapy.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microglial SIRT6 confers protection against neuroinflammation-associated depression through NRF2-HO1 signaling.Neurobiology of stress · 2026Article
- Intranasal administration in modulating depressive-like behavior and reconstructing treatment paradigms through neuroinflammation and neurotrophic pathways.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains a major clinical challenge, affecting nearly one-third of individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) who fail to respond to standard antidepressant therapies. Esketamine, the S-enantiomer of ketamine, has emerged as a novel therapeutic option. Esketamine, initially introduced as an add-on therapy, has more recently also received recognition for use as a standalone treatment. This review aims to synthesize current clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of esketamine monotherapy while exploring its molecular mechanisms and identifying research gaps. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, MedRxiv, and BioRxiv up to March 2025. Although designed as a systematic review, only one qualifying clinical trial was identified, limiting the feasibility of a meta-analysis and underscoring the scarcity of direct evidence. Despite this limitation, molecular insights suggest that TRD is associated with glutamatergic system dysfunction, impaired neuroplasticity, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis abnormalities, and neuroinflammatory processes. Intranasal esketamine demonstrates potential as a rapid-acting and effective standalone therapy for TRD; nevertheless, further robust, large-scale randomized controlled trials are essential to confirm its therapeutic benefit, establish optimal dosing strategies, and overcome current research limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.