Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41185718›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

A New Era for Esketamine in Managing Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Systematic Review of Its Use From Adjunct to First-Line Therapy.

Bhavya, Srijan Shetty, Balakrishnan Sadasivam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

BhavyaPharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND.
Srijan ShettyPharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND.
Balakrishnan SadasivamPharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains a major clinical challenge, affecting nearly one-third of individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) who fail to respond to standard antidepressant therapies. Esketamine, the S-enantiomer of ketamine, has emerged as a novel therapeutic option. Esketamine, initially introduced as an add-on therapy, has more recently also received recognition for use as a standalone treatment. This review aims to synthesize current clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of esketamine monotherapy while exploring its molecular mechanisms and identifying research gaps. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, MedRxiv, and BioRxiv up to March 2025. Although designed as a systematic review, only one qualifying clinical trial was identified, limiting the feasibility of a meta-analysis and underscoring the scarcity of direct evidence. Despite this limitation, molecular insights suggest that TRD is associated with glutamatergic system dysfunction, impaired neuroplasticity, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis abnormalities, and neuroinflammatory processes. Intranasal esketamine demonstrates potential as a rapid-acting and effective standalone therapy for TRD; nevertheless, further robust, large-scale randomized controlled trials are essential to confirm its therapeutic benefit, establish optimal dosing strategies, and overcome current research limitations.

Indexed as

esketamineesketamine monotherapynasal spraytrdtreatment-resistant depression (trd)

Identifiers

PMID41185718
PMCPMC12579747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.