ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2025
Pharmacological Management of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; A Qualitative Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a complex psychiatric condition requiring sustained pharmacological management. Although several medications are used in the clinical practice, post-marketing data on their real-world effectiveness and safety remain limited. Objective: To explore the pharmacological management patterns of PTSD through a qualitative analysis of Phase 4 interventional trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Methods: A qualitative descriptive analysis was conducted using data from completed phase 4 interventional trials addressing pharmacological treatments for PTSD. Studies were identified through a structured search of ClinicalTrials.gov up to 27 June 2025. Eligible trials included pharmacological interventions with posted results. Data were extracted on drug types, therapeutic classes, outcome measures, and sample characteristics, and thematically analysed to identify prevailing research trends. Results: A total of 41 clinical trials were included. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were the most commonly studied drug class, with multiple trials demonstrating consistent reductions in PTSD symptoms on standardized scales such as the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS). Additional trends included evaluation of hypnotics for sleep disturbance, alpha-1 blockers for nightmares, neuroendocrine agents (eg, mifepristone) for stress hormone regulation, and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor modulators (eg, d-cycloserine) for memory reconsolidation. Primary outcomes also assessed neuroimaging markers, cortisol levels, and sleep-related metrics. Most studies enrolled small to moderate-sized samples, and variability in design and endpoints highlighted a lack of standardization across trials. Conclusion: This is the first qualitative synthesis of phase 4 PTSD pharmacotherapy trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, highlighting real-world safety and long-term tolerability gaps that are not analysed in earlier phase studies. The study concluded that the reliance on SSRIs and the growing exploration of novel pharmacological targets in PTSD. The observed heterogeneity reflects the complexity of the disorder and the fragmented nature of current evidence. Findings emphasize the need for future phase 4 trials with larger sample sizes, standardized outcome measures, and newer pharmacological designs to strengthen the applicability of results to clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.