Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41185700›Full record

Trial reportPeerJ2025

Acute effect of percussion and foam roller massage on flexibility, reactive and explosive strength, and muscular endurance in young adult males: a crossover pilot study.

Peter Bartik, Martin Pacholek

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter BartikSport Sciences and Diagnostics Research Lab, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Martin PacholekSport Sciences and Diagnostics Research Lab, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5480-0466

Funding

Prince Sultan University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percussion massage (PM) using massage guns has become popular for enhancing flexibility, muscle performance, and recovery, but evidence on its efficacy is mixed. Foam rolling (FR) is another standard modality with similar claims. This study aimed to compare the acute effects of PM and FR on hamstring flexibility, specific muscle performance types (reactive and explosive strength), and muscle fatigue. Methods: A randomized, controlled crossover design was employed with 18 physically active university students. Participants underwent three conditions: PM with Theragun, foam rolling, and a no-activation control (WA), each separated by a 4-5 day washout. Flexibility was assessed Results: PM significantly improved hamstring flexibility, demonstrated by lower AKE angles compared to FR and WA ( Conclusions: PM provides an immediate enhancement in hamstring flexibility superior to FR and no treatment, but none of the interventions acutely improve muscle reactive/explosive strength or endurance. These findings suggest that PM may be an effective pre-activity tool for improving flexibility. However, it should not be relied upon as an acute performance enhancer for physically active individuals. Further research on long-term and varied protocol effects is recommended.

Indexed as

Hamstring MusclesMassageMuscle StrengthPercussionPhysical EnduranceRange of Motion, ArticularAdultCross-Over StudiesHumansMaleMuscle FatiguePilot ProjectsYoung AdultFlexibilityFoam rollerMuscular enduranceMuscular strengthPercussion massage gunPerformance

Identifiers

PMID41185700
PMCPMC12579856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.