Trial reportPeerJ2025
Acute effect of percussion and foam roller massage on flexibility, reactive and explosive strength, and muscular endurance in young adult males: a crossover pilot study.
Trial report in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Short-Term Tensiomyography Responses of the Vastus Medialis to Percussive Massage Therapy with Different Frequency-Duration Combinations.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Percussion massage (PM) using massage guns has become popular for enhancing flexibility, muscle performance, and recovery, but evidence on its efficacy is mixed. Foam rolling (FR) is another standard modality with similar claims. This study aimed to compare the acute effects of PM and FR on hamstring flexibility, specific muscle performance types (reactive and explosive strength), and muscle fatigue. Methods: A randomized, controlled crossover design was employed with 18 physically active university students. Participants underwent three conditions: PM with Theragun, foam rolling, and a no-activation control (WA), each separated by a 4-5 day washout. Flexibility was assessed Results: PM significantly improved hamstring flexibility, demonstrated by lower AKE angles compared to FR and WA ( Conclusions: PM provides an immediate enhancement in hamstring flexibility superior to FR and no treatment, but none of the interventions acutely improve muscle reactive/explosive strength or endurance. These findings suggest that PM may be an effective pre-activity tool for improving flexibility. However, it should not be relied upon as an acute performance enhancer for physically active individuals. Further research on long-term and varied protocol effects is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.