ArticleDigital health
Predictive value of artificial intelligence and radiomics for atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation for pulmonary vein isolation.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Atrial Fibrillation Management: From Signal to Strategy.Balkan medical journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia disorder with a high recurrence rate after catheter ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Improved preoperative evaluation strategies are needed to enhance prediction accuracy and optimize patient selection for ablation. Materials and Methods: This study included 311 AF patients who underwent catheter ablation for PVI, stratified into recurrence ( Results: A feature selection process was applied to determine the most predictive features, resulting in a set of 50 radiomics features and 33 clinical features. The average dice value of the deep learning heart segmentation model was 88.95%, and the area under the curve (AUC) value of the radiomics model for predicting the risk of AF recurrence after PVI was 0.74(95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54, 0.79). The AUC value of the fusion model integrating clinical laboratory indicators and radiomic features was 0.79(95% CI 0.69-0.84). According to the results of the interpretability analysis of the model, multiple radiomics features were determined to be significantly associated with AF recurrence. Conclusion: This study presents a non-invasive model for predicting post-PVI recurrence and quantifies the contribution of specific cardiac structures to AF recurrence risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.