ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2025
Stereotactic Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using CyberKnife with Non-Invasive Skin Fiducial Marker Tracking in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility, Dosimetry, and Early Outcomes.
Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Stereotactic Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: A Structured Literature Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Automatic segmentation of clinical target volume for radiation therapy in breast-conserving patients and exploration of clinical factors influential to its performance.The British journal of radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, dosimetric characteristics, and early clinical outcomes of CyberKnife (CK)-based accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using non-invasive skin fiducial marker tracking in an Asian population. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 74 female patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer who underwent APBI using the CK system between May 2019 and December 2024. Patient selection was based on the modified 2017 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) consensus criteria. The total tumor doses were 30 Gy in 5 consecutive daily fractions. Non-invasive skin fiducial markers were used for respiratory motion tracking. Dosimetric parameters were recorded according to European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) recommendations. Primary clinical outcomes, acute and chronic toxicities were evaluated during a median follow-up period of 26.5 months. Predictive factors for toxicity were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: A total of 74 patients having a median age of 56 years were included in the study, with a median follow-up period of 26.5 months. Non-invasive skin fiducial markers demonstrated a strong correlation with internal surgical clips, validating their accuracy for motion tracking. The median conformity and homogeneity indexes were 1.15 and 1.20, respectively. Median mean heart doses were 1 Gy (left-sided) and 0.5 Gy (right-sided), while the ipsilateral lung mean dose was 2.34 Gy. Two patients (2.7%) developed ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. There were no grade ≥2 toxicities or cardiopulmonary events observed. Radiation dermatitis represented the most common acute toxicity (48.6%), whereas breast fibrosis was the most frequent late toxicity (12.2%). Skin D0.03cc >29.45 Gy and PTV-to-breast volume ratio >14.5% were associated with grade 1 dermatitis, while a breast volume <455.2 cm Conclusion: By retrospective reviewing, APBI using the CyberKnife system with non-invasive skin fiducial marker tracking is a safe, precise, and effective treatment option for early-stage breast cancer. Although this retrospective study with limited follow-up demonstrated favorable dosimetric outcomes and minimal acute toxicity, further prospective studies with larger cohorts and longer observation are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.